Examining Juliets Response in Act 3, Scene 5 :: Papers

Examining Juliets Response in Act 3, Scene 5 Juliet is very sad, extremely worried, by the time she is with her parents again. Romeo is going to leave Juliet after spending their wedding night to furbish upher. This thought is unbearable for Juliet. Romeo has to go before day comes because otherwise, he will get caught by Juliets kinsman and might be killed. Romeo uses a contrast and very direct simple language to explain his situation to Juliet I must be gone and live, or stay and die. The stress and emotional anxiety caused by this deep situation impacts on Juliets response to her parents. She is worried and scared. She is instant when her lady Capulet comes in. Lady Capulet comes in and sees Juliet is crying and thinks she is crying for her loss of cousin, Tyblat. Evermore weeping for your cousins death? then Juliet responds yet let me weep for such feeling loss. Her mother assumes Juliets loss is Tybalt, because she does not know she is completely in love with Romeo. This use of striking irony because the audiences know that Juliets loss means Romeo but Lady Capulet thinks her loss is Tybalt. Juliet is misleads her mother by answering her questions in a tricky way. Shakespeare uses it to shows she is intelligent and artful. She also says to her mother indeed I never shall be satisfied with Romeo, till I behold him - dead, notice when she speaks this sentence there is a pause before she says dead. This means she does not want Romeo dead. The reason that she says that is to mislead her mother. She answers her mothers question skilfully, and she is playing on words. When Lady Capulet tells Juliet that they have arranged her marriage for her with Paris, She refuses to get hitched with him. She says I will not marry yet. And when I do, I swear it shall be Romeo, whom you know I hate, rather than Paris. At this point Shakespeare uses another effective dramatic irony. She does not want to marry Paris be cause she

The Scapegoating of Homosexuals as Threats to Society Essay -- Gay Les

Politics of Exclusion - The Scapegoating of Homosexuals as Threats to Society It is hard to believe that this bill is anything other than a thinly veiled attempt to score policy-making debating points by scapegoating gay and lesbian Americans.-John F. KerryThe monster lulls reason into a night of unknowing in which sleeping leviathans do not lie.-Timothy K. BealIntroduction The scapegoating of homosexuals as grotesque threats to the order of society allows for their exclusion from institutions such as marriage, legal adoption, and The Boy Scouts of America. To reverse this discrimination, we must learn to make room for the chaotic queer monster, to embrace its presence not as threatening, but rather as inevitable, necessary, and vital to the dynamism of our culture. With this shift, we will receive the means to create a politics of inclusion. In spite of the pluralistic and egalitarian principles that lie at the foundation of our nation, we live in a culture with little toleran ce for deviation from what is considered to be the norm. We have created, and strive to maintain, an illusion of a uniform, ordered, and righteous American lifestyle. From this narrow conception of America, we gain a sense of solidarity and security. Consequently, those who pose a challenge to this ideal atomic number 18 pushed into the margins of society and excluded they become second-class citizens. As a result of the threat they pose to this limited model of conventional order, gays and lesbians are chief among the subclass of secondary citizens. contrasted other marginalized minority groups, homosexuals are explicitly denied access to institutions central to American life and character, namely, the legal family unit and The Boy Scouts. For, if... ...26 February 2004 .36 Gay Men Lose take the field on Adoption discard New York Times On the Web 29 January 2004, 26 February 2004 .37 Rebecca Walsh, For the Family Lesbian Couple Challenging Gay Adoption Ban in Utah The Salt Lak e Tribune 7 July 2003, 29 February 2004 .38 Bruce Alpert, Debate Grows Over Ban on Adoption by Gays Newhouse New Service 1 April 2002, 29 February 2004 .39 Alpert.40 Alpert.41 Alpert.42 Alpert.43 Walsh.44 Walsh.45 Linda Nicholson and Steven Seidman, ed. Social Postmodernism (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1995) 118.46 Laura Benkov Reinventing the Family (New York Crown Publishers, 1994) 145.47 Beal 19648 Kantor 5.49 Beal 10.50 Beal 196.